Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Nursing Home Covid-19 Death Claims Sent Back to State Court

A case against a California nursing home over a resident’s alleged coronavirus death can proceed in state court despite the facility’s bid to move it to federal court, a U.S. district judge ruled.

The decision highlights the extent to which a federal public readiness law prevents state-law, pandemic-related negligence claims. At least a half dozen federal circuits are hearing similar cases.

The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act doesn’t completely preempt the plaintiffs’ claims because they don’t allege the death was “causally connected” to the use of any covered countermeasure, Judge John F. Walter of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ruled June 25.

The PREP Act gives nursing homes immunity from claims arising from the administration or use of medical countermeasures such as vaccines and medications.

Plaintiff Olive Reed sued Sunbridge Hallmark Health Services LLC in Los Angeles County Superior Court after Lawrence Reed allegedly developed an “entirely preventable” Covid infection that led to his death. The plaintiff argued that Sunbridge failed to conduct nursing assessments, properly monitor Reed, or take the proper precautions to prevent the spread of Covid-19.

Sunbridge moved to remove the case to federal court because it argued that the PREP Act preempted the claims. The district court rejected Sunbridge’s arguments.

Walter ordered the case remanded back to the state court. “Numerous courts have concluded that allegations like these do not fall within the scope of the PREP Act,” he said.

Potter Handy LLP is representing the plaintiffs. Wilson Getty LLP, counsel for Sunbridge, didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

The case is Reed v. Sunbridge Hallmark Health Servs. LLC, C.D. Cal., No. CV 21-3702-JFW(AGRx), 6/25/21.

View source

Stay updated on the latest.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.